Which output format MP4 or HLS+DASH is more suitable?

In a perfect world, videos would stream without interruption, adjusting to our every desire and internet variation. This is the world of DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP), MP4 (MPEG-4 Part 14), and HLS (HTTP Live Streaming). These formats create a symphony of streaming alternatives, each bringing unique characteristics to the digital stage.

HLS is a live-streaming technology, created by creative minds at Apple. Especially for Apple enthusiasts, it effortlessly divides large video streams into smaller, more manageable HTTP-based files, making streaming a snap.

Let us introduce DASH, a worldwide innovation created by MPEG. It participates in the adaptive bitrate domain with HLS, but it adds a spin of its own by providing a rainbow of container types and codecs. It is a favorite across a variety of devices and browsers because of its adaptability.

The digital multimedia container format MP4 is widely used for storing audio and video files. It is cross-platform compatible, however, it doesn’t have native support for adaptive bitrate streaming or live streaming as HLS and DASH do.

Use Cases

When it comes to live streaming, HLS and DASH are the better options because of their adaptive bitrate streaming capabilities, which guarantee the best possible video quality based on the user’s internet speed. Both HLS and DASH are suitable for on-demand content, retaining these adaptive benefits. Nevertheless, even without adaptive streaming capabilities, MP4 is still a good choice for on-demand video.

In terms of platform and device compatibility, MP4 delivers unparalleled worldwide interoperability, DASH works well with a variety of non-Apple devices and browsers, while HLS performs best on Apple devices. MP4 lacks adaptive bitrate streaming, which could cause buffering or latency on slower connections. HLS and DASH, on the other hand, guarantee a buffer-free experience through streaming.

Technical points to consider

The appropriateness of these formats is largely dependent on their technical characteristics. HLS and DASH offer a fluid watching experience by adjusting the streaming quality in response to internet speed. Particularly DASH stands out for its adaptability when it comes to codec and container selection. DRM (Digital Rights Management), which is essential for content protection, is also supported by both formats. Even while MP4 supports DRM, its lack of adaptive streaming features makes it unsatisfactory in the streaming context.

Benefits and Drawbacks

Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of these formats is crucial for making well-informed choices. The major benefit of adjustable bitrate streaming is provided by HLS and DASH, which are suitable for both live and on-demand material. Additionally, they support DRM for content security. They are more difficult to implement, though, and there may be compatibility problems with non-Apple devices with HLS in particular.

On the other hand, MP4’s advantages are its consistent quality, ease of use, and universal compatibility. However, it does not provide adaptive bitrate streaming and is not appropriate for live broadcasting.

In summary, which option to choose between HLS+DASH and MP4 depends on the particular needs of your application. For live streaming, HLS+DASH is the best option, however MP4 is the most widely compatible format. HLS and DASH offer superior quality adaptive streaming and offer the greatest user experience. To make use of each format’s advantages, a combination of them is used in many contemporary applications.

The choice should be based on a deep comprehension of the intended audience, the type of material, and the platform’s or service’s technological setup.

For more understanding visit:

1 Like